Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Apache’

Using your Netscaler for http server header obfuscation

April 18th, 2011 No comments

Masking the web server software in your http header/http server banner (server header obfuscation) is an important layer of security you might want to implement since it can be accomplished so easily on a Netscaler. It’s a layer of security you can add to prevent someone from telling what kind of web server you are running, though it is still quite possible to figure out depending on your environment and application so don’t rely on it too much. The thought is an attacker scans for certain versions of a web server that have known vulnerabilities and begins running attacks for that specific web server software to see if those vulnerabilities have been patched or not. They can do this programmatically so changing the header to say something else is a layer of security that can prevent them from easily figuring out what your web environment infrastructure is like.

You will notice that Chase.com uses “JPMC1.0″:

Amazon.com uses just “Server”:

Google.com uses “gws”:

This can be done very easily using rewrite policies on the Netscaler. Catherine Hampton wrote a great article over at the Ctirix Developer Network on how to do this:

http://community.citrix.com/display/ns/Using+Rewrite+to+Improve+Web+Server+Security

And if you want to read more about web server fingerprinting, check Net-square’s website and their httprint tool:

http://net-square.com/httprint/

Saumil Shah at Net-square wrote an excellent and very thorough article on HTTP fingerprinting here:

http://net-square.com/httprint/httprint_paper.html

How to properly use SSL redirects without getting certificate error messages

March 7th, 2011 8 comments

Today I would like to go over proper URL redirection when using SSL but first I would like to preface this by describing what proper URL redirection is. Anytime you inherit, consult for, or build an environment out from scratch, you must always verify every vector a user may use to get to your website. You must plan accordingly to intercept and redirect the user transparently when they manage to get to URLs that you don’t want them to use. They should never be prompted for an action (such as “click here” to continue) or receive a warning/error message if at all possible.

A 301 redirect is in my opinion to best way to steer a user to where they need to go. A 301 tells the browser/search engine spider that the redirect is permanent. In the case of spiders, a 301 will tell it only the destination URL should be indexed. A 301 redirect works fine over regular HTTP connections and all web servers and load balancers are capable of performing them. Alternatively, you can also use a 302 redirect but this tells spiders the redirect is temporary. Not very good for SEO purposes if your organization is concerned about that.

The problem occurs when you try to do a 301 or 302 redirect to an SSL URL (HTTPS URL) but the SSL certificate for that URL does not match the domain. It will throw a warning message saying the connection is untrusted or that there is a problem with the website’s security certificate in the user’s browser. Most users will come across on an HTTP connection such as http://www.domain.com and if needed, the network/web engineer would setup a web server or load balancer policy to perform the 301 redirect to https://www.domain.com. The certificate in this case is valid for “www.domain.com” and will not throw an error. But what if the user somehow manages to go directly https://domain.com over an SSL connection? It would throw an error unless the certificate is valid for “domain.com” which is most cases it is not. Even if you had a wildcard certificate for “*.domain.com”, it would not prevent you from getting a warning because this specifies any subdomain is valid, but does not cover just the domain by itself. Your user will always get a warning message. You may think you could write a policy on your load balancer to do the redirect but that will not work. The reason is a TCP connection has to be established first and during the SSL handshake before the connection is fully established is when the user gets the warning. The policy will never run as a result until after the user accepts the warning message and the SSL handshake is completed.

There are a couple of ways to get around this. The cleanest way of doing it is using a Subject Alternate Name (SAN) SSL certificate. A SAN cert allows you to specify exactly what domains you would like the certificate to be valid for. The price on SAN certs is much higher than a standard certificate or even a wildcard certificate and they are only available from a handful of certificate authorities at this time. They require a lot more validation typically and the validation term is usually a bit lower than a standard certificate.

Let’s compare a SAN SSL certificate vs. a Wildcard SSL certificate. A single SAN cert would cover me for the following if I wanted it to:

domain.com
www.domain.com
www.myotherdomain.com

while a single Wilcard SSL cert would only be able to do the following:

*.domain.com

It is possible to combine both so you could get a SAN + Wildcard SSL certificate that will cover all of the above. To my knowledge, the only certificate authority that currently offers them is DigiCert. They have a pretty nice write up about their cert here:

http://www.digicert.com/ssl-support/wildcard-san-names.htm

I once asked a VeriSign managed PKI rep why they don’t offer wildcard + SAN like DigiCert and he went on for 5 minutes about ICAAN policy. Why one cert authority can issue while another won’t, I am guessing it likely has to do with acquisition costs for them. You have to remember, VeriSign is still trying to convince people to buy SGC SSL certs (for legacy browsers) at a premium price when in my opinion, SGC has been obsolete for years now and any web/network engineer that knows about SSL encryption has anything below 128 bit locked down anyhow. But I guess if people will buy it, they will sell it. Either there just hasn’t been enough demand or their costs are too high for wildcard + SAN certs. Not trying to pick on VeriSign, just making an observation. I still purchase certs from them regularly (non-SGC of course). Most every large organization does, but sometimes the wildcard + SAN might be the best solution for you. I know some CDN providers like Akamai sometimes have a need for them and purchase through DigiCert.

Getting back on subject, a second way of getting around this is purchasing two standard SSL certifcates and putting them on different IPs. One will do a 301 redirect to an another. So you would have to purchase an SSL cert for domain.com AND www.domain.com.

Let’s look at some real world examples to better understand this. I am going to compare Chase, Bank of America, Citrix, and Amazon.com to show the different types of solutions for this problem.

Chase.com
Chase uses SAN certs from VeriSign. Again, SAN certs are a very pricey approach but the easiest. Your configuration on your load balancer and servers is minimal since one SSL cert will take care of everything. This will result is less overhead on your load balancers as well which is a big plus when you serve up millions of connections.

Go to https://chase.com, it will immediately do a 301 redirect to https://www.chase.com. Here is a screenshot showing the 301 redirect to https://www.chase.com and the certificate which shows the 4 Subject Alt Names Chase’s cert is valid for:

As you can see, the certificate is valid for www.chase.com, chase.com, www.yourchasefreed.com, and yourchasefreedom.com. You will also notice that the cert is only valid for a 1 yr period. Typically CAs will try and limit you to a max of 2 years on SAN SSL certs and EV SSL certs but it is always best practice to keep them to 1 year just in case your cert keys were compromised. A SAN cert can have many domains leaving you very exposed, so it is a good idea to change it every year for this reason.

Bankofamerica.com
Bank of America uses standard SSL certs from VeriSign. Cheaper but a little extra configuration involved on the load balancer. Let’s take a look at what happens when you visit https://bankofamerica.com:

You will be 301 redirected to https://www.bankofamerica.com just as you were with Chase. But this time using a standard SSL cert with one CN name as you saw above. You can verify this by pinging bankofamerica.com which resolves to 171.159.100.173 and typing just the IP into the browser over SSL as https://171.159.100.173. This will give you an SSL error before the 301 redirect gets a chance to run and you can view the cert:

So just to be clear, typing https://bankofamerica.com will use the above cert which is valid, will complete the connection, run a policy that will do a 301 redirect to https://www.bankofamerica.com, cert for https://www.bankofamerica.com is validated, then the connection is completed and the page is served up. A perfectly good way around the problem using standard SSL certs as opposed to SAN SSL certs.

Citrix.com
Citrix is another example of using the standard SSL certificate redirect method much like Bank of America. But they do not leverage the 301 redirect at all. Instead they use a 302 temporary redirect pointed directly to their index page. The 302 is likely done for SEO purposes so the “www.citrix.com” domain is indexed in search results and not the “www.citrix.com/lang/English/home.asp” destination page. In this case, a Netscaler with either a responder policy or content switching policy will send you to https://www.citrix.com or https://citrix.com which both display the same content. They are on different VIPs with different SSL certs. One is a standard cert while the other a wildcard. They could have used two standard certs if they wanted to as well of course but in this case, they may use the wildcard for other subdomains, GSLB, etc. and the standard cert is meant to solely capture those users typing in an incorrect URL:

Amazon.com
Woops! The world’s largest online retailer does not seem to be redirecting customers that arrive on an irregular URL over SSL properly. If you go to https://amazon.com, it will give you a “This Connection is Untrusted” error. It’s not the end of the world but still, a user should never see a message like this.

In IE for example, it will say “There is a problem with this website’s security certificate”. Again, not the end of the world. But in Chrome, the error will have a bright red background and say “This is probably not the site you are looking for!
You attempted to reach amazon.com, but instead you actually reached a server identifying itself as www.amazon.com. This may be caused by a misconfiguration on the server or by something more serious. An attacker on your network could be trying to get you to visit a fake (and potentially harmful) version of amazon.com. You should not proceed.”

Yikes! Do you really want your users to see a message like this?

Interesting to note however, going to https://www.amazon.com does a 301 redirect to http://www.amazon.com. Obviously Amazon wants the customer to use HTTP rather than SSL on their homepage. Much less overheard on their load balancers plus they don’t have a login box directly on their home page so no need for SSL to begin with. This is thought out well but I am puzzled as to why they don’t do anything about https://amazon.com. As you saw with Chase, Bank of America, and Citrix, the different solutions are very easy to implement.

I hope this article has been helpful. Please post a reply if you have a different solution to the problem that I did not cover. I would love to hear your insights. :)

How to automatically put up a maintenance page on a Netscaler when all your websites are down

March 1st, 2011 15 comments

In a worst case scenario and all your web servers have failed, what do you do? You could have a standby group of servers or CDN on or off premise to pick up the load or at least display a maintenance page but this is worst case scenario. A catastrophic failure and ALL your servers are down due to a code issue, server configuration issue, database issue, virtual infrastructure failure, SAN failure, maintenance being performed on all servers at once (I hope not on purpose), virus outbreak, or whatever else kind of horrible scenario you can think of. You get traffic all the way up to the Netscaler appliance but since your vserver is down, the user’s browser will timeout as if your company fell off the face of the earth. This is very unprofessional for any organization. Users timing out or seeing a “page could not be displayed” error is unacceptable.

So the solution is to have the Netscaler display a maintenance page with the code hosted on itself somehow. I tried several different methods including content filtering and responder policies using HTML. Originally I even thought I could leverage integrated caching to serve up cached pages and static content like images. I settled only using a responder policy initially which worked. Citrix even has a very nice knowledge center article (CTX117337: How to Configure a Maintenance Web Page by using the Responder Feature of the NetScaler Appliance) which is located here:

http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX117337

In a nutshell, what the author of the article wrote is basically more or less the same conclusion I reached as well. I just did it via GUI and that is what I will show you below. But I was not happy with the result. Keep reading and you will see why. FYI, I did all the screenshots below on an NS 9.1 appliance but it is the same procedure on NS 9.2 or any other version.

1. I am going to assume you have servers, services/service groups, and a vserver already that is UP and running. I will call them the following in this example:

vserver – lb_vsver_mywebsite
service group – svcgrp_myservicegroup
server – svr_mywebserver

Excuse the redactions in my screenshots please, I had some other configurations on this test appliance and I don’t want to confuse you with it:

vserver:

service group:

server:

2. Now create a backup vserver for your existing live vserver. In this example, I have called it “lb_vsvr_bkup_mywebsite”. But instead of giving it an IP, just uncheck directly addressable. This will cause the IP area to become greyed out:

backup vserver:

When you click Create, it will show up as running on the IP 0.0.0.0 like below:

3. Now you need to create a service that is always UP and bind it to this backup vserver so that it will always remain UP. Just go under Load Balancing > Services, and click Add. Then create a service called “svc_maintpage” but for the Server, type in the localhost IP of 127.0.0.1, add a ping monitor, and press create.

4. Now go back to your backup vserver and bind this new service to it. Immediately after clicking OK, the backup vserver should go into an UP state. You might need to refresh your window if it doesn’t.

5. Now double click on your live vserver and under the Advanced tab, choose “lb_vsvr_bkup_mywebsite” for the Backup Virtual Server option and press OK:

6. Now under Responder > Action, click Add to create a new action. This is where you get to put some HTML and CSS. It must be very basic, all parenthesis have to be removed when using CSS in the HTML body or it will give you can error, and the whole policy must be under 255 characters total. I will name mine “action_mywebsite_maint_page” and here is an example of my policy I will use with it:


"HTTP/1.0 200 OK" +"\r\n\r\n" + "<html>
<style type=text/css>
<!--
.mywebsitefont {
  font-size: 24px;
}
-->
</style>
<body class=mywebsitefont>Sorry, our website is currently not available. 
Please try again later.</body></html>" + "\r\n"

7. Now under Responder > Policy, click Add to create a new policy that will call on the action you just created. In this example, all we need is for the HTTP request to be valid and we will display the maintenance page. I will name it “resp_policy_mywebsite_down” in this example. Choose the action you just made in the Action drop down and for the expression, just put:

HTTP.REQ.IS_VALID

8. Now go back to the Load Balancing folder and double click your backup vserver and bind the responder policy to it like below:

9. Now to test. Open up your website in a browser and it should display as normal right now. Now login to your webservers and turn off your websites. Immediately your live vserver should say DOWN for the State but the Effective State should remain UP. This is because all traffic is being forwarded to your backup vserver you specified earlier which is set to always be up:

Refresh your browser and you should now see the maintenance page you created like below:

As you can see, a simple HTML page like above is not very professional. We need more HTML/CSS than 255 characters to work with and we need images working to make it look professional. At least it is better than a page timeout though!

Now with a content filtering policy, you don’t have to worry about a character limit. You can get away with putting HTML/CSS in a content filter policy. But again, where do the images come from?

I decided to call Citrix and see if they have run into a request like this. They had not. Now off the bat both techs I spoke to said what I was trying to do is not supported by Citrix. A Netscaler is not designed to do this. But luckily the second tech Brian at Citrix Support was just as enthusiastic about getting something to work as I am and wasn’t going to give up easily so we went over a few scenarios. The Netscaler does have an Apache web server on board, that is how the admin GUI is display to you. It is also how the Access Gateway portal is displayed to the end user. We needed to figure out a way to leverage the Apache web server on board the Netscaler to host our images, HTML, CSS, etc. The initial thought was to overwrite the Access Gateway portal and create a responder policy that would do a redirect to an Access Gateway vserver you create. The negatives here are that you are limited to SSL traffic only, have to worry about having a valid cert, you can’t bind all the policies you might need to it like you can a load balanced VIP, etc. I didn’t feel that comfortable destroying functionality to gain other functionality either.

In the end, the solution was easy and did not require overwriting the Access Gateway portal. We can host our HTML, CSS, and images on the Netscaler itself and point Apache at it. Brian did a quick proof of concept in his lab. Then I improved on it a bit. Here is the end result which I am sure a lot of you will find pretty handy in your organizations. Steps 1 through 5 are the same as above. Then from there, begin these steps:

1. First we need to get our HTML, CSS, and images on the Netscaler. WinSCP into your Netscaler and go to “/netscaler/ns_gui”. The folders you see called admin_ui, vpn, etc. are what host the Netscaler Admin GUI and Access Gateway respectively. So you have the option of putting something in the root of this folder or even create a separate folder here if you want. In my case, I decided to put a “maintenance.htm” in the root and also create a folder called “static” that will host most static content like CSS and images.

2. Now under Responder > Action, click Add to create a new action. Very important, make sure to change the type from Response to Redirect. The action should be the following (with parenthesis included):

"http://www.mywebsite.com/maintenance.htm"

3. Now under Responder > Policy, click Add to create a new policy that will call on the action you just created.. Your responder policy will need to allow the maintenance page, plus CSS, .gifs, and .jpgs you might use. So the policy I will use is:

!HTTP.REQ.URL.CONTAINS("maintenance.htm") && !HTTP.REQ.URL.CONTAINS(".gif") && !HTTP.REQ.URL.CONTAINS(".jpg") && !HTTP.REQ.URL.CONTAINS(".css")

4. Now go back to the Load Balancing folder and double click your backup vserver and bind this new responder policy to it like I did below:

Now if you disable your service groups and check your maintenance page again, you can see how the website displays the full page with nice HTML, CSS, and images. In this example, I borrowed the Sears.com maintenance page. Notice how showing your company logo keeps your branding intact even on a maintenance page which is the correct way to handle a website issue. Tell your users you are aware of the problem and offer alternatives in the meantime (static links along the bottom to other servers that are up and offering content in this example). You don’t have to go that far but it’s always nice to let your user base know you haven’t disappeared and your infrastructure is solid. This is very professional and above all, automated! :)

The only problem here is that when your website is back up, users will still be refreshing on this maintenance.htm page. They will get a 404 error. So you have four options. I usually prefer number 4 personally but it all depends on your needs:

1. Change your maintenance.htm page to say index.htm or whatever page is the default page of the root of your website so when they refresh once the vserver is back up, they will get the live page. You will need to WinSCP into your Netscaler again and change the maintenance.htm file name as well as change it in your Responder Action. The issue here is if let’s say you are using .NET, you can’t call it index.aspx because Apache on the Netscaler can’t parse it.

2. Just create a link on the page that says “Click Here to Try Again” which is pointed at the correct index page. This assumes the end user will actually click the link instead of hitting refresh. You can’t be 100% sure they will do this.

3. Create a maintenance.htm page on your servers and then set IIS, Apache, or whatever web server you use to do a 301 redirect to your live index page. You can leverage the Netscaler to do the redirect too of course.

4. My preferred method. Create a new responder policy saying any maintenance.htm should automatically redirect to index.aspx and bind it only to your real vserver. That way anyone that requests that page when your servers are up will always be redirected to your index page. In this example, I will call my live site’s index page index.asp and call the action policy “action_mywebsite_index_redirect”. I will also make it redirect to SSL in this example because there is a login box on the index.asp page and I want to keep it secure using https:

I will call the responder policy “resp_policy_index_redirect” and for the expression, tell it to redirect any requests to “/maintenance.htm”:

HTTP.REQ.URL.CONTAINS("/maintenance.htm")

Now bind this to your live vserver:

Now you can test it by disabling and enabling your servers or service groups. It should transition automatically between your maintenance page and the live index page. :)

One thing I would like to point out. On any of your Responder Policies or Actions, you can always view the hit counter to see if the policy or action is being invoked. This might help you when you are setting this up initially and something goes wrong and you want to see if the policy or action is being hit:

So there it is. Your Netscaler is now an emergency web server that automatically puts up a professional looking maintenance page in a worst case scenario when every backend web server you have is down. A big thank you to Brian at Citrix for the help! If anyone can think of any improvements to this process or has any trouble with it, please reply I would love to hear about your experience.

Verifying that SSLv2 and weak ciphers are disabled for PCI compliance

August 9th, 2010 4 comments

There are 4 easy ways to check that SSLv2 and weak ciphers are disabled on your web servers and appliances. SSLv2 is deprecated and should never be used. You will definitely need to verify these are disabled for PCI compliance and SOX compliance. The instructions below apply to check SSLv2 on any web server (IIS, Apache, iPlanet, etc.) or any traffic or load balancing appliance (Citrix Netscaler, F5 BigIP, etc.).

1. SSLDigger - Download it here http://www.foundstone.com/us/resources/proddesc/ssldigger.htm. It’s a great little tool that first tests for SSLv2, then gives you the option to test for weak ciphers one by one, then spits our a nice little HTML report of the findings. You can even create a .txt file with all your URLs to test and perform testing in bulk. This is wonderful when you have many domains to test and need to give a report to management quickly.

Checking the Google.com SSL cert (click to enlarge):

Checking for weak ciphers systematically (click to enlarge):

HTML report (click to enlarge):

2. OpenSSL – The old favorite. Type the following to connect to your web server or appliance over SSLv2:

openssl s_client -connect www.yourdomain.com:443 -ssl2

It should connect giving you a CONNECTED(000007C0) message but then immediately fail and display an error message like one of the following:

419:error:1407F0E5:SSL routines:SSL2_WRITE:ssl handshake failure:s2_pkt.c:428:
420:error:1406D0B8:SSL routines:GET_SERVER_HELLO:no cipher list:s2_clnt.c:450:
10076:error:1407F0E5:SSL routines:SSL2_WRITE:ssl handshake failure:. \ssl\s2_pkt.c:428:
write:errno=548965:error:1407F0E5:SSL routines:SSL2_WRITE:ssl handshake failure:s2_pkt.c:428:
write:errno=10054

SSL handshake failures and connection resets (errno=10054) are completely normal if SSLv2 is disabled. The specific error message you get will depend on exactly what behavior your web server or appliance is configured to do when a client connects using it.

Example of SSLv2 disabled:

Example of SSLv2 enabled (VERY VERY BAD!):

3. Nessus – Download it here http://www.nessus.org and use the Home Feed and setup a new scan using the SSL Anonymous Cipher Suites Supported and SSL Version 2 (v2) Protocol Detection plugins. Please make sure to disable all the other plugins, you don’t want all that hitting your server. Just these 2 are sufficient. Then check the Reports and see if it is reporting SSLv2 as a vulnerability.

4. External SSL checkers – Running nice little tools like the above three is nice to check your servers when you are internal but if you want to see what 3rd parties are seeing externally, use one of these online SSL checkers to test:

http://foundeo.com/products/iis-weak-ssl-ciphers/test.cfm
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/

How to parse HTML files as PHP on an Apache web server

May 18th, 2009 No comments

Someone asked me today for help with their PHP website.  He was trying to parse HTML files as PHP on his Apache webserver. This is very easy to do using the .htaccess file but he just could not seem to get his files to parse using the instructions he found on Apache’s website:

AddType application/x-httpd-php .html

The thing to remember with something as diverse as Apache and PHP, different hosts will have different configurations. For example, some hosts runs both PHP4 and PHP5. In this case, he was hosting the company website through HostGator. This is what had to be added to the htaccess file to get it to correctly parse the files:

AddHandler application/x-httpd-php5 .html .htm

With other hosts, you can get away with:

AddType application/x-httpd-php .html .htm

or

AddHandler application/x-httpd-php .html .htm

or

AddHandler x-httpd-php .html .htm

And still yet, some hosts require both AddHandler and AddType directives for it to work correctly:

AddType application/x-httpd-php .htm .html
AddHandler x-httpd-php .htm .html

Hope this helps. Leave a comment if you have any questions.

Categories: Apache Tags: , , ,